Making Statism

Unpopular

Home
Articles
 
Back
 
The Patriotic Duty to Dissent


By Professor Marjorie Cohn
Jurist
March 8, 2002


Reichmarshall Hermann Goering of the Third Reich once said: “It is always
a simple matter to drag the people along” to do “the bidding of the
leaders,” regardless of the form of government. “All you have to do,” he
said, “is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the
peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It
works the same in any country.”

Indeed, this strategy is working in the United States. Attorney General
John Ashcroft painted the defenders of civil liberties as anti-American
fear-mongerers when he said in December: “To those who scare peace-loving
people with phantoms of lost liberty, my message is this: Your tactics
only aid terrorists, for they erode our national unity and diminish our
resolve. They give ammunition to America’s enemies and pause to America’s friends.”

This is the same John Ashcroft who rammed the “USA PATRIOT Act” through a
timid Congress, urged federal agencies to resist Freedom of Information
Act requests, and plans to engage in new COINTELPRO-style surveillance activities.

Ashcroft’s PATRIOT Act creates a new crime of domestic terrorism so broad
it will cover civil disobedience and target environmental and
anti-globalization activists. Representative Scott McInnis (R-CO) has
already subpoenaed a spokesperson for Earth Liberation Front, which
McInnis has dubbed an “eco-terrorist” organization, to appear before the
House Subcommittee on Forests and Forest Health.

No wonder Ashcroft has instructed all federal agencies to resist Freedom
of Information Act requests. The FOIA, enacted in 1974 in the wake of the
Watergate scandal, is one of our most significant democratic reforms. It
permits citizens to hold the government accountable by requesting and
publicizing public records and documents. Pursuant to FOIA requests, the
Charlotte Observer recently uncovered records detailing how the Duke Power
Co. manipulated its books to avoid exceeding profit limits that would have
mandated a rate cut, and USA Today exposed a widespread pattern of
misconduct among the upper echelon of the National Guard, including the
inflation of troop strength, misuse of taxpayer money, sexual harassment
and the theft of life-insurance payments.

Ashcroft also seeks to resurrect the counterintelligence programs, known
as COINTELPRO, which were responsible for intensive FBI surveillance in
the 50’s, 60’s and 70’s. The spying, which targeted Martin Luther King,
Jr. and other civil rights leaders, was so horrendous that Congress put a halt to it.

The new “patriotic” act will permit the government to spy on all of us
more easily through its aptly named Carnivore surveillance system.
Carnivore devours all of the communications flowing through an internet
service provider’s network, not just those of the target of the surveillance.

In mid-December, the FBI announced it is developing another new internet
spying software called “Magic Lantern.” It will surreptitiously enter an
individual’s personal computer, record every keystroke and zap all of that
data back to the G-men and G-women, in violation of the federal
wiretapping statute and the Fourth Amendment.

Many people oppose the direction of the government’s war on terror, which,
Vice President Dick Cheney warns, will last 50 years and extend to 50 or
60 countries. There is opposition to President George W. Bush’s request of
an additional $48 billion to enhance an already engorged military budget,
at the expense of social services. Yet many fear they will be harassed for
speaking out against the government in this time of xenophobic flag-waving.

Those who seek to curb the excesses of governmental repression do so at
great risk. Human rights activist Benjamin Prado, who tried to document
the U.S. Border Patrol’s racial profiling on the San Diego Trolley, was
savagely beaten, assaulted and detained by 12 Border Patrol agents for 25
hours with no charges, after his video camera was confiscated and destroyed.

Hundreds of other people of color, particularly those of Middle Eastern
descent, are currently detained in U.S. prisons. Most, like Rabih Haddad,
are suspected of no crime or connection to the events of September 11; yet
they are being held incommunicado, in indefinite, preventative detention,
in violation of the Constitution. In a recent letter, Haddad, a Lebanese
immigrant who has been in custody for 76 days in Ann Arbor, Michigan,
detailed his conditions of confinement. Strangely reminiscent of the
prisoners in Guantanamo, he described his 6’ by 9’ solitary cell, the
camera permanently fixed on him, his lack of exercise and “waves of
cockroaches” in his cell at night.

Mr. Haddad’s story brings back memories of the excesses of our government
during World War II, when it interned thousands of Japanese-Americans, in
a shameful and racist overreaction. In a similar dragnet, federal agents
have announced they will soon begin apprehending and interrogating
thousands of Middle Eastern immigrants who have ignored deportation orders.

President Bush has accused the terrorists of attacking our democratic way
of life. The foundation of a democracy is the right and duty to dissent
against misconduct by governmental leaders. Dissent, also unpopular in the
early stages of the Vietnam War, was later voiced by a majority of Americans.

We are responsible for the actions of our government. When it fails to act
in a moral and lawful manner, we must speak out and educate our fellow
citizens about the abuses. If we fail to dissent for fear of governmental
retaliation, we will have confirmed the truth of Hermann Goering’s frightening prediction.

Marjorie Cohn, an associate professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law in
San Diego, is on the national executive committee of the National Lawyers Guild.

Thomas Jefferson School of Law

 

The Pragmatic Side of Principle in Pursuit of Public Policy